<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Head in the Clouds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://permabit.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/head-in-the-clouds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://permabit.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/head-in-the-clouds/</link>
	<description>Information and Opinions from the Permabit Team</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:08:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Storagezilla</title>
		<link>http://permabit.wordpress.com/2008/11/25/head-in-the-clouds/#comment-64</link>
		<dc:creator>Storagezilla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Nov 2008 13:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://permabit.wordpress.com/?p=60#comment-64</guid>
		<description>We&#039;ll gloss over the usual Centera evil empire parts as every competitor has an opinion (But very little market presence) on that.

&quot;Last week I did say that now is the time to consider investing in new, cheaper, more effective storage architectures so that you can save money in tough times. I definitely stand by that, but I’m not saying you should change your whole application chain to fit into totally new interfaces at the same time….&quot; 

Who&#039;s changing what applications? I understand you&#039;re looking at this through the archiving app but look at Amazon S3, no XAM there just SOAP/REST. 

I wouldn&#039;t count out XAM support but EMC already has a solution for that and it&#039;s called Centera. There&#039;s an entire developer community from large to small building cloud services on SOAP/REST and not only aren&#039;t they aware of XAM, they don&#039;t care about XAM. 

You don&#039;t have to like it, it&#039;s where the target market for Atmos has settled on we want they&#039;re money so we&#039;re using their interfaces of choice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We&#8217;ll gloss over the usual Centera evil empire parts as every competitor has an opinion (But very little market presence) on that.</p>
<p>&#8220;Last week I did say that now is the time to consider investing in new, cheaper, more effective storage architectures so that you can save money in tough times. I definitely stand by that, but I’m not saying you should change your whole application chain to fit into totally new interfaces at the same time….&#8221; </p>
<p>Who&#8217;s changing what applications? I understand you&#8217;re looking at this through the archiving app but look at Amazon S3, no XAM there just SOAP/REST. </p>
<p>I wouldn&#8217;t count out XAM support but EMC already has a solution for that and it&#8217;s called Centera. There&#8217;s an entire developer community from large to small building cloud services on SOAP/REST and not only aren&#8217;t they aware of XAM, they don&#8217;t care about XAM. </p>
<p>You don&#8217;t have to like it, it&#8217;s where the target market for Atmos has settled on we want they&#8217;re money so we&#8217;re using their interfaces of choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
